St. Vincent COVID-19 vaccine mandate case referred to Privy Council
Key Points(4)
- By a 2–1 majority, the appellate court ruled that the Government acted lawfully in enforcing the mandate and terminating non-compliant employees.
- One judge dissented, raising concerns about disproportionate measures and constitutional overreach.</p> <p data-start="989" data-end="1343">With the referral to the Privy Council, the final decision now rests with the UK-based court, the highest appellate body for St.
- Vincent and the Grenadines and other Commonwealth jurisdictions.
- The Privy Council will review written submissions and may hold oral hearings in London.
The Court of Appeal has directed that the landmark legal challenge against St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ COVID-19 vaccine mandate be sent to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London for final determination.
The case stems from the dismissal of dozens of public sector workers in late 2021 for refusing to comply with the mandate. Trade unions and legal representatives for the workers have argued that the terminations violated constitutional rights, including freedom of conscience and protection from unfair dismissal.
In February 2025, the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal overturned a 2023 High Court ruling that had favoured the workers. By a 2–1 majority, the appellate court ruled that the Government acted lawfully in enforcing the mandate and terminating non-compliant employees. One judge dissented, raising concerns about disproportionate measures and constitutional overreach.
With the referral to the Privy Council, the final decision now rests with the UK-based court, the highest appellate body for St. Vincent and the Grenadines and other Commonwealth jurisdictions. The Privy Council will review written submissions and may hold oral hearings in London. A final ruling is expected to take several months and will be binding.
Government officials have defended the mandate, stating it was necessary to protect public health and ensure the continuity of essential services during the pandemic, and that it aligned with both constitutional provisions and international best practices.
