The 2021-2022 Belize sugar crop ends on Friday, and while the season got off to a rocky start, the American Sugar Refinery/Belize Sugar Industries (A.S.R./B.S.I.) says it ended on solid footing even as it acknowledged that an estimated 100,000 tons of cane will go to waste in the fields.
“Last year we were at around 1.2 million tons, so we’re short around 50,000 tons from last year. Last year, as we are aware, only about 20 to 30,000 of stand-over cane was left. We had several challenges this year,” said ARS/BSL Cana Farmers Relations Manager, Olivia Carballo-Avilez.
“We started late; we could have started on December 20. It is when the mill was ready, and we were ready to go. We had challenges with weather issues. We had a stop for about 14 days, which really you cannot take back. Those days are gone, so because of the finite time of a crop season, we have to wrap things up and start our repair season because after this, when the gates are closed, the whole mill is going to be taken down, repaired, and then put back up in time for the next crop,” she added.
She said it is also “unfair that farmers have to have their cane already tied into a manufacturer, unable to grind that cane.
“Even though BSI has been boasting tremendous investments, these investments have not been going in the area that really benefits the cane farmers, which is the grinding rate.”
This year’s crop has been threatened by calls for higher prices from the Belize Sugar Cane Farmers’ Association (BSCFA) and is asking for government intervention.
At the center is a pending commercial agreement that both parties are yet to sign. The BSCFA wants higher payments for bagasse, but BSI’s Director of Finance, Shawn Chavarria, says the company has put its best offer on the table but the cane farmers have refused to accept.
“There probably needs to be a reset from the BSCFA’s negotiating team to really objectively analyze the situation, analyze the facts that we have presented to show what the impacts of their proposals would have.
“We have presented two proposals. We have looked at their option of a 60-40 value share. We have said we are prepared to work with that. The only fundamental difference that we have compared to that is that one, they want a higher payment for bagasse, which we have explained to them we can’t do, and we have demonstrated why.
“We have provided them with the audited financial statements from BELCOGEN to show that it is making losses and it has cumulative losses. The added step was taken of showing them the power-purchase agreement with BEL to show that the tariffs that BELCOGEN receives do not include a value for bagasse,” said Chavarria.
But the BSCFA says its research information has determined the exact opposite.
“We have done our research. We have looked at the figures that BSI themselves have provided us every month, every year in terms of how they calculate it, and we have seen where they have unfairly been using the cost factor see how they could have our farmers pay more for these things,” said BSCFA’s chief executive officer, Oscar Alonzo.
CMC/
